Category Archives: Opinions

Trevor Nunn – 1937-2024

It is with a heavy heart that I am writing to inform you of the passing of one of the hobby’s true masters, and a very close friend, Trevor Nunn.

As a quiet and unassuming person, Trevor never sought the limelight and was perhaps not as well known generally within the hobby as he might have been: had he worked in 4mm scale, he would have been seen as a guiding light. But as soon as he saw S scale in 1973 he knew it was right for him (see MRJ number 10). Trevor was quietly determined, and once he wanted to do something, simply got on with it, learning new skills and techniques along the way. At this time he had a young family and they also moved house a few times due to work and also what he once described as one of his other hobbies: taking on houses in need of a bit of attention, and doing them up, so work on the new layout progressed in fits and starts, but he quickly put together a small portable layout, “Wicken”, along with a couple of locos (a GER 209 -LNER Y5 – class 0-4-0ST and a G15 – Y6 – 0-4-0T tram) plus some wagons and a couple of coaches and started exhibiting. By 1980 he has built his wonderful E22 (J65) “baby buckjumper” and with the addition of Len White’s S56 (J69) buckjumper, was a regular on the exhibition circuit: Wicken was 14’ long and only 16” wide, and packed away into two units 3’6” long and about 16” square (two pairs of boards, face to face) so it was easy to transport and store. After a few years where modelling took a back seat to other activities (see above!) and during which progress was slow – the E10 0-4-4T took nine years to build – Trevor took early semi-retirement and started work on East Lynn in 1993, which debuted in very basic form at Leicester in 1995, followed by The Scale Show in 1996 and then the CMRA show in 1997, which led to a lot of exhibition invites – I know, because I was his primary assistant for the first 120 days or so!

Although not averse to using some components made elsewhere, such as the late Trevor Charlton’s etched zinc coach sides, some wagon body castings and of course, a few etchings for axleguards (“W-irons”) and detail castings, plus coach and wagon wheels, Trevor largely built from scratch – including making the wheels for his locos! Even some of the castings he used were from his own patterns, such that the only genuinely bought-in parts of his superb GER G14 4-4-0 (with working Joy inside motion) were the motor (Mashima) and gearbox (High Level) and etched number plates. He even painted and lined his locos himself, as well as his rolling stock – all hand lettered. He shared his techniques within the SSMRS Newsletter/Gazette. Having tried a few of them myself, I learned how clever were his ideas – and how much a taskmaster he was to himself: real care was required over the precision of workmanship. Regular practice and discipline were the keys to effective results here, and watching him work or receiving instruction/guidance from him revealed that he took less time than I did because he was as well rehearsed as he was well-versed in being a methodical engineer. (By trade, he designed and built the mechanical parts of medical instruments.)

Trevor enjoyed exhibiting – he rarely set up his layouts at home – and liked going out on the road. These were also good social occasions for those involved with supporting him – many SSMRS members would turn up at a show and be given a controller and a shunting pole – and although he didn’t build models with the intention of getting awards, the quality of his modelling meant that inevitably he garnered many cups for “Best Layout”, both from the visiting public vote but also more rewardingly from other exhibitors. The ultimate accolade, perhaps, came from the late Bob Essery, who when asked what his highlight had been in the hobby, commented on watching East Lynn being operated. The point was, the layout worked superbly, was operated properly, had working signals, and to cap it all, was largely hand-built from scratch! At one of the Chiltern Model Railway Association events, the late Iain Rice cast a critical (and appreciative) eye over Trevor’s masterpiece, the GER G14 class 4-4-0 with working inside Joy’s valve gear, and turned to Tim Watson and remarked, “This modelling is where I get down on my knees in respect.”

In building East Lynn, Trevor started to scribe and paint his own brickwork, at first directly onto the plywood carcass (the station building) but then onto cartridge paper, and to represent carstone with scribed and painted modelling clay. He thoroughly enjoyed doing this, and despite saying he had no plans to extend the layout, he soon added to it with the Quayside for East Lynn, on which there are a number of buildings, each of which took him as long to build as a loco (between 150 and 300 hours!) He also turned a slightly rough and ready kit for a Thames barge into a superb model, which drew admiration from his friend Gordon Gravett (who used to build models of ships for a living). This took a solid 2 months of his time, up to 16 hours a day – quiet determination meant that once he had the bit between his teeth, he really got down to it. (And at other times, he might not do any modelling for several weeks, if he felt disinclined: “No point doing it if you won’t enjoy it.”) Having completed this, Nunstanton was added, along with increasing rolling stock including for the M&GNJR, so by 2010, there was 28’ of scenicked layout available for exhibition, which debuted at the CMRA in 2010. Finally, the existence of some reasonable quality ply plus the M&GNJR locos and stock gave Trevor the excuse to build Trowland, a small layout only 8’ long – again, easy to transport and with a lot on interesting operating potential.

In amongst this, Trevor built a number of locos, or parts of locos, for others and would also help with making something that didn’t run quite as well as hoped, run like a Swiss watch. I have three such examples, and know how well they run.

A few years ago, he bought a house with a small barn/large garage at the rear, and the whole edifice of East Lynn and Nunstanton was erected and available for operation, as happened a few times at what were also social gatherings. As he became more aware of time passing, he made his layouts available to anyone interested, preferring to know where his models were going rather than them being spread amongst collectors who might not run them. As a consequence of this, I own both East Lynn (without the quayside) and Nunstanton as well as a substantial portion of the GER locos and stock, although I cannot set the latter up at home, and the former only on occasion. (This will change soon on moving house.) East Lynn is scheduled to appear at the Cambridge 31A exhibition in September 2024.

I first encountered Trevor in the late 1970s, at a number of local model railway exhibitions where he was present with “Wicken”. I even spent a weekend helping a friend with his 00 layout at the Milton Keynes exhibition, placed next door to Wicken. The gauge of the track and the size of the models drew me in, as they had for Trevor a few years earlier. As a shy teenager, I didn’t ask any questions but listened in as Trevor generously explained how he made things to anyone who asked. At a later show I grabbed an information leaflet and wrote to the S Gauge (as it then was) Model Railway Society and received a response suggesting I introduce myself at Milton Keynes in October 1981, where Thame was present, and lo and behold, there was Trevor, and our friendship started there and then – soon I was operating Wicken at any exhibition I could get to (not many as I was a student and usually too far away!) which culminated in becoming a regular operator by the late 1980s, and thereafter to assisting with the superlative East Lynn as it expanded to incorporate the Quay, then Nunnstanton, and of course the stand-alone Trowland. Despite the “generation gap” we always got on well, and Trevor never spoke down to me. In fact, he never did to anyone. He was as open as he was unassuming, and always happy to talk to anyone who was interested, and very generous when it came to sharing his experiences and techniques. I personally learned a lot from him, but not solely as a modeller. In those sometimes long journeys together to and from Exhibitions, it is impossible not to develop bonds of friendship. He gave me the only useful advice about parenting, when my first child was on the way: “Don’t believe all the rubbish. You’ll get what you’re given, and have to do the best job you can to bring them up well.” That stood me in good stead and helped me stay sane as my children grew up!

The hobby has lost one of its greatest all-rounders, and I have lost a very dear friend and trusted advisor. My condolences go out to his widow and children, who like Trevor I am pleased to call my friends.

The Impact of Scale

I have had a regular email correspondence with Geoff Forster (of Penhydd, Llangunllo and latterly Bleddfa Road fame) for many years and our topics are varied, to say the least! We recently discussed the simplifications he is making to his layout, and I made the following observation which he thought I should share with you:
I do think that as well as following “less is more”, you are discovering that “more requires less”, i.e. that because you have moved up a couple of scales, it is easy to get an overcrowded feel to a scene in the same space, but on the other hand the extra volume of the model means that you don’t need as much by the way of layout (or models on it).
I have previously touched on selecting a scale (more than once) that suits your own needs, but I thought that brought it together nicely. Also, Geoff said it was about time I provided a new post! I have noticed over the years that many people become wedded to a particular scale simply because they have got used to it. I understand that, but sometimes, it is worth making the leap. As Geoff is interested in minimal operation, and fully understands that you can only drive one train at a time, then moving up two scales has allowed him to put more time and thought into details and texture – not that there was anything wrong with what he achieved in EM. He is also much more interested in modelling than simply buying. Even off-the-shelf RTR gets a critical review and details are added (or removed!) to create a portrayal of an individual example of a loco, coach, wagon or whatever – preferably with reference to a photo that coincides with his time frame for the layout. This may not involve much work, but he does take a bought “good” and turn it into a personalised model. If your motivation is in the finer details, and movement brings the scene to life, then adopting a larger scale has much to offer. And of course, if you wish to recreate the impression of a busy four track mainline, then your own focus may incline towards a smaller scale because the finer details are less important than the overall scene, and you want to get more of the overall scene into your available space. It is also possible that your own interests will change (evolve, even!) over time. The point is, allow yourself to grow and develop, and don’t just accept that maybe something new is a challenge, but a good thing to be embraced with open arms. You never know: you might even enjoy it!

Lydham Heath at Ludlow, September 3rd

I am taking Lydham Heath to the small show put on near Ludlow on the first Saturday of September, the venue is the Mascall Centre in Lower Gladeford, SY8 1RZ. The show is open from 10 till 4.

As I have an impending house move and need to consider downsizing, then Lydham Heath is available for sale, complete with two locos, a coach, and a handful of wagons (representing the stock which came with the layout when I bought it) plus a couple of 3D printed bodies: one for another coach and one for a wooden bodied van. Seriously interested parties are invited to contact me, and could even leave the exhibition with an S scale layout of their own!

If you are the kind of person who thinks a layout built by a leading railway modeller renowned for his expertise in modelling scenery but actually a really good all-round modeller (Barry Norman), with stock built by him and another great modeller (Tankie and the brake van were built by Laurie Griffin) should exchange hands for a handful of beer tokens, then probably best not to enquire after the price…

Authenticity and “Finescale Renegades”

Saw this on a forum, from a modeller whose work I do admire:

Finescale 00 used to be a thing. For some of us it still is. It’s a state of mind as well as a set of measurements.

I always thought that a finescale version of 00 was EM, given that “finescale”* is a state of mind about getting things closer to the prototype, and a track gauge that is 96.7% of the prototype measurement is closer than one which is  87.7%. I mean, would you accept such a measurement error as big as 97% in any other respect of the prototype, leave alone 88%? I say this not to start a gauge war, but to make the point about the degree of error involved in modelling the track – the one thing that above all else differentiates this hobby from other modelling disciplines. Those who advocate narrowing the gauge to 16.2mm only exacerbate the issue…

”Finescale 00” is an attempt to make the best of a bad job without having to re-wheel steam locos. Given the profile of modern RTR wheels, some diesels and most rolling stock can be regauged to EM by moving the wheels out (and older stock probably needs it replacing with something concentric anyway!) so it boils down to steam locos and track. Since you have to build your own track for this standard, that leaves the locos, and if there are kit-built locos, which can be built to other standards, it just boils down to RTR steam. That and the fact that when you started out, you chose this standard and now have an awful lot of model railway, and getting it changed is not going to happen.

Don’t get me wrong: I realise that we all have choices to make over these things, and I am all for improving the running by tightening up the tolerances (i.e. “flangeways”, flanges and B2B) of any set of integrated track and wheel standards, but I can’t see how something so far off scale dimensions can be called “finescale”, and given the definition of finescale as a mindset about getting closer to scale, and the measurement error in the track gauge, well, how is 00 ever going to be finescale? Finer, yes. But finescale? I think not. YMMV, of course; that’s my personal view.

* See “Proprietary to Scale”, C J Freezer, Railway Modeller, January 1974, for this – indeed the only to my knowledge – definition of “fine scale”, where he makes the point that “scale model” was first applied to differentiate away from “toy trains” and meant (in his words) “authentic”. I think realistic might have been a better choice: “like the real thing”. His point was that unless you accepted this definition, then “fine scale” was meaningless, but (in précis) actually means “even less like a toy”. This was down to Greenly, who advocated a larger scale than that used for the track to accommodate the crude wheel standards in use for tinplate trains. Because modelling railways is about more than individual models, most people prefer to start with something already made, and ”improve it” rather than starting wholly from scratch and enjoying the journey, and ”purchasing” is frequently used to mean ”modelling”.

If you define “finescale” as “improving the running of 00 without changing the gauge, but otherwise working to EM standards”, then that works, but how could that definition be applied to, say, military modelling?

Satisfaction

I do not normally comment on model railway magazines: very few maintain consistently good output, but the latest issue of Model Railway Journal, number 284, contains a very nice piece of writing with lovely pictures by John Duffy concerning his 0 gauge layout, “Rosehearty”. Aside from the delightful and much neglected prototype railway (the Great North of Scotland Railway) as subject, the author goes to considerable effort to explain why he built the layout – something which the guest editor, Barry Norman, is always keen to explore.

You can see some photos on John’s thread on RMWeb, but to me the message was, understand why, and you will get much, much closer to personal satisfaction.